|
When I collected these spiders in Taiwan, I thought I was collecting two different genera, Pholcus (left) and Leptopholcus (right). It was only back home with a good microscope that I realized that the two species were not only the same genus (Pholcus) but that they had almost identical genitalia. This is usually interpreted as a strong indication for conspecificity. ![]() Here we describe these two putative species that differ conspicuously in their microhabitat (rocks vs. leaves), coloration, colour pattern, and body proportions, but have almost indistinguishable genitalia and cytochrome oxidase I (CO1) sequences. We decided to treat the two ‘morphs’ as species for three reasons: (1) they are easily distinguished by several characters; no intermediate specimens were found; (2) subtle yet consistent differences in genital (uncus) shape support the idea of reproductively isolated entities beyond the more conspicuous non-genital differences; (3) each locality provided both types of microhabitat but only one of the two species, arguing against environmental plasticity or polymorphism. We conclude that a very recent expansion into a novel microhabitat may have led to speciation and rapid ecological and non-genital differentiation, with insufficient time to accumulate significant genital and genetic differences. |